Posted by: transpassage | August 27, 2008

In honor of Del Martin

Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon getting married in SF during 2004.

Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon getting married in SF during 2004.

Wow - I can’t believe that Del Martin passed away today.  I have trouble imagining where the LGBT advocacy community would be without her decades of dedicated work.   

Her obituary, featured on EQCA, is reposted below in its entirety:

Dorothy L. (Del) Martin (May 5, 1921 – August 27, 2008)

Died on Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at UCSF Hospice, San Francisco, California. Survived by spouse Phyllis Lyon, daughter Kendra Mon, son-in-law Eugene Lane, granddaughter Lorraine Mon, grandson Kevin Mon, sister-in-law Patricia Lyon and a vast, loving and grateful lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender family.

An eloquent organizer for civil rights, civil liberties, and human dignity, Del Martin created and helped shape the modern lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) and feminist movements. She was a woman of extraordinary courage, persistence, intelligence, humor, and fundamental decency, who refused to be silenced by fear and never stopped fighting for equality. Her last public political act, on June 16, 2008, was to marry Phyllis Lyon, her partner of 55 years. They were the first couple to wed in San Francisco after the California Supreme Court recognized that marriage for same-sex couples is a fundamental right in a case brought by plaintiffs including Martin and Lyon.

Born in San Francisco on May 5, 1921, Dorothy L. Taliaferro, or Del as she would come to be known, was salutatorian of the first graduating class of George Washington High School and went on to study journalism at the University of California at Berkeley. At 19, after transferring to San Francisco State College (now San Francisco State University), she married James Martin and two years later gave birth to their daughter Kendra. The marriage ended in divorce.

Del Martin met the love of her life, Phyllis Lyon, in Seattle in 1950 when they worked for the same publication company. They became lovers in 1952 and formalized their partnership on Valentine’s Day in 1953 when they moved in together in San Francisco. In 1955, they bought the small home that has been theirs ever since.

In what would prove to be an act that would change history, Martin, Lyon, and six other lesbians co-founded the Daughters of Bilitis (DOB) in San Francisco in 1955. DOB, which was named after an obscure book of lesbian love poetry, initially was organized to provide secret mutual support and social activities. It became the first public and political lesbian rights organization in the United States, laying a foundation for the women’s and lesbian and gay liberation movements that flowered in the early 1970s and continue today.

Del Martin used her writing and speaking talents to challenge misconceptions about gender and sexuality. “We were fighting the church, the couch, and the courts,” she often remembered years later, naming the array of social and cultural forces early activists confronted when homosexuals were treated as immoral, mentally ill, and illegal. As the first President of DOB, she penned stirring calls to arms. “Nothing was ever accomplished by hiding in a dark corner. Why not discard the hermitage for the heritage that awaits any red-blooded American woman who dares to claim it?” She was the second editor (after Phyllis Lyon) of DOB’s groundbreaking monthly magazine, The Ladder, from 1960 to 1962 and ushered in a new decade of political engagement and media visibility for the nascent gay rights movement. The Ladder grew from a mimeographed newsletter in 1956 to an internationally recognized magazine with thousands of subscribers by 1970, and thousands more readers who copied its contents or circulated it among friends and coworkers. Martin’s many contributions to The Ladder ranged from short stories to editorials to missives: one of the most famous is “If That’s All There Is,” a searing condemnation of sexism in the gay rights movement written in 1970. Due to Martin’s influence, The Ladder provided one of the few media outlets confronting misogyny in the decade before the rebirth of women’s liberation.

In 1964, Del Martin was part of a group that founded the Council on Religion and the Homosexual in order to lobby city lawmakers more effectively to reduce police harassment and modify the sex laws that criminalized homosexual behavior. In later years, Martin was also a founding member of the Lesbian Mother’s Union, the San Francisco Women’s Centers, and the Bay Area Women’s Coalition, among other organizations.

As an early member of the National Organization for Women (NOW), Del Martin worked to counter homophobia within the women’s movement – fear of the so-called “lavender menace.” She and Lyon were the first lesbians to insist on joining with a “couples’ membership rate” and Martin was the first out lesbian on NOW’s Board of Directors. Their efforts helped to insure the inclusion of lesbian rights on NOW’s agenda in the early 1970’s.

Lesbian/Woman, the book they co-authored in 1972, is one of Martin and Lyon’s landmark accomplishments. The book described lesbian lives in a positive, knowledgeable way almost unknown at the time. In 1992, Publishers Weekly chose it as one of the 20 most influential women’s books of the last 20 years.

For many years, Del Martin was a leader in the campaign to persuade the American Psychiatric Association to declare that homosexuality was not a mental illness. This goal was finally achieved in 1973.

Del Martin’s publication of Battered Wives in 1976 was a major catalyst for the movement against domestic violence. Martin became a nationally known advocate for battered women, and was a co-founder of the Coalition for Justice for Battered Women (1975), La Casa de las Madres (a shelter for battered women) founded in 1976, and the California Coalition against Domestic Violence (1977). She lectured at colleges and universities around the country. Martin received her doctorate from the Institute for Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in 1987.

Martin’s keen political instincts and interests extended her influence into the mainstream Democratic Party. She and Lyon were co-founders, in 1972, of the Alice B. Toklas Democratic Club, the first gay political club in the United States. Martin was appointed Chair of the San Francisco Commission on the Status of Women in 1976 and served on the committee until 1979. She worked as a member of many other councils and boards including the San Francisco Commission on the Status of Women. Throughout the years, many politicians recognized their stature as community leaders and sought advice and endorsement from Martin and Lyon.

It is difficult to separate Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon and write about only one of them. Their lives and their work have intertwined and their enduring dedication to social justice has been recognized many times. In 1979, local health care providers established a clinic to give lesbians in the San Francisco Bay area access to nonjudgmental, affordable health care and named it Lyon-Martin Health Services in their honor. In 1990, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Northern California awarded the couple with its highest honor, the Earl Warren Civil Liberties Award. In 1995, Senator Dianne Feinstein named Martin, and Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi named Lyon, as delegates to the White House Conference on Aging, where they made headlines by using their moment at the podium to remind the 125,000 attendees that lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people grow old, too, and must be included explicitly in aging policies. The Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality gave Martin and Lyon their Outstanding Public Service Award in 1996. They are among the most beloved figures in the LGBT community and have served as Grand Marshals at Pride marches across the nation and been honored by every major LGBT organization in the country.

Del Martin identified her own legacy in 1984 when she said that her most important contribution was “being able to help make changes in the way lesbians and gay men view themselves and how the larger society views lesbians and gay men.” She had the courage to be true to herself when the world offered only condemnation for lesbians. Martin showed all of us how to have what she called “self-acceptance and a good sense of my own self-worth.” Del Martin never backed down from her insistence on full equality for all people and, even at 87 years old, she kept moving all of us closer to her ideal.

Gifts in lieu of flowers can be made to honor Del’s life and commitment and to defeat the California marriage ban through NCLR’s No On 8 PAC at www.nclrights.org/NoOn8.

A public memorial and tribute celebrating the life of Del Martin will be planned in the next several weeks.

(Photo credit: USA Today)

Posted by: transpassage | August 27, 2008

Boycotts do work!

Given the fact that I’ve talked about Bolthouse Farms and their connections to the “Yes on Prop. 8″ campaign before, I felt like this would be some good news to share. Apparently, the CFO of Manchester Financial Group, the company that owns the Manchester Grand Hyatt and the Grant Del Mar, has expressed some worry to Manchester about his decision to financially support the “Yes on Prop. 8″ campaign due to the fear of boycotts:

In a July 29 e-mail to Manchester, Paul Wilkins, chief financial officer for the group, said he believed “this boycott effort will cost you millions of dollars of lost revenue and possibly tens of millions of dollars in lost value for both the Manchester Grand Hyatt and The Grand Del Mar.”

See!  Boycotts due make a difference! 

Another article in The Wall Street Journal also talks about the boycott efforts (unfortunately giving some erroneous information about William Bolthouse’s connection to Bolthouse Farms - yes, he is indeed still connected to the company, despite what Bolthouse Farm’s has said!), which have ultimately spurred Hyatt Corp. to publicly state that they do not back Manchester’s political beliefs:

A spokeswoman for Hyatt Corp. in Chicago said it doesn’t require its hotel owners to follow any particular policy. “We absolutely don’t have a position on the proposition itself but we have a really strong, long track record of inclusiveness in terms of the way we welcome our guests and the way we treat our employees. Doug Manchester…in no way speaks for Hyatt,” said the spokeswoman.

Personally, I think this is all really great news.  When the American Family Association is out boycotting McDonald’s for getting to cozy with Teh Gays (the website is pretty funny - I suggest you check it out), it’s great to see the queer folks stand up for themselves and put a bit of pressure on the Prop. 8 backers in California.  Go team!

Posted by: transpassage | August 22, 2008

Will VP pick Biden flake on LGBT community?

Joe BidenRather quietly tonight, in my opinion, Sen. Barack Obama announced that Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) is his VP pick (great picture of Joe on the left, don’t you think?). I won’t bother repeating the fairly decent, if brief, summary that Waymon Hudson’s already put together over at the Bilerico Project of Biden’s voting record on LGBT (really queer… or really gay and lesbian…) issues. Take a peak.

Seems fairly rosey a review, though, so I’d also suggest this brief post from Citizen Crain for a bit more balance. He talks slightly more substantively about why Biden hasn’t gotten stronger scores from the HRC’s congressional report cards. Chris Crain’s question basically sums it up:

Senator Biden, you’ve avoided express commitments and delayed or avoided co-sponsorship on some gay rights legislation pending in Congress. And you’ve not said to what extent gay couples who are married or in civil unions should receive federal recognition. Are you prepared now to make firm, clear commitments and if so, why has it taken you so long?

Now I wish I’d seen them ask that at the HRC/Logo debates! Too bad Biden had “scheduling conflicts” and couldn’t attend… (I think he was the only invited Democratic candidate to not speak at the event.)

Hopefully in the coming days I’ll have some time to pull together a more thorough look into his record on gender identity related legislation. Something to watch for in the coming days at TRANS∙pose, I suppose (look, I rhyme!).

What do you think? Any preliminary impressions of the senator?

Posted by: transpassage | August 21, 2008

Wordle

(Photo credit: Wordle.net)

Posted by: transpassage | August 21, 2008

1,049 papers nationwide will print queer wedding announcements

August 18th (that was Monday, for those calendar impaired readers) of 2002, The New York Times finally started letting queer couples print wedding and commitment ceremony announcements in their Weddings/Celebrations section.  At the time, only 68 other papers nationwide printed these announcements.

Flash forward to the present: Today the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) has announced that 1,049 papers nationally will print wedding announcements for queer couples.  That’s a fifteen-fold increase in just six short years.  Awesome.

We know how much it helps for the average person to hear personal stories about the queer and gender-variant communities.  Minds change.  Laws change.  Life is good.  Plus, if most folks are anything like my parents, whatever you read in print in a “real” (read: traditional, print source) newspaper or hear on the news is obviously the gospel truth (because we know all know newspapers only print the facts, right?).  With Prop. 8 going on in California and equally craptastic legislation on the ballot elsewhere, this is obviously an important time to get this kind of individual activism going in our communities.    

Because of this, GLAAD’s put together a great online resource to help you get started putting in a wedding announcement, mentioning you’re gay and happy in your company newsletter, or where ever else you think your story should be.  There are downloads like the banner on the top of this post, AIM buddy icons, an interactive map of the country with information on inclusive policies at all the daily newspapers in the nation - you get the idea.  You won’t see the word “queer” mentioned anywhere on the resource (unless it’s in an announcement you submit - hint, hint), but your identity is too cool for them anyway (the day the national orgs start throwing around genderqueer, genderfuck, etc., is the day I move on to a different identity descriptor).   

How’d GLAAD do all this?  Well, there was a dedicated albeit small team of fellows (ahem, cough, cough) and interns working very hard to call, and re-call, and call again, all of these newspapers to find out if they had inclusive policies.  Most were friendly.  A few weren’t.  Overall, it was a fun and educational process.

In any case, check it out.  Maybe download an AIM buddy icon for your instant messanger application of choice and make my day.

Related Media

Huffington Post - Aug. 21, 2008
The Advocate.com - Aug. 21, 2008
Good As You - Aug. 18, 2008

Posted by: transpassage | August 20, 2008

Speak of the devil…

Thanks to a tip from New World View on this. 

Remember Kenneth Zucker’s treatment techniques for gender variance in children?  For a refresher, revisit his NPR interview and listen to him talk about what sounds remarkably like reparative therapy (P.C. slang for Love Won Out and other so-called “ex-gay” movement trash).  Then, move on to this petition, courtsey of the Questioning Transphobia blog:

Protest Zucker’s Invite to Speak at Royal Society of Medicine Conference

Please sign the petition below to protest the horrific decision to invite trans-reparatist quack Kenneth Zucker to address attendees at a conference on gender-variant youth in the UK. First he was invited to sit on the committee to oversee revisions to the GID diagnosis in the DSM, now this? When will this universally reviled doctor in the trans community stop being rewarded by the mainstream for his dangerous and egregious actions? Enough is enough!

Here is the text of the petition and a link to it:

We the undersigned wish to protest in the strongest possible terms against the inclusion of Dr Kenneth Zucker in the Royal Society of Medicine’s conference on “Gender Identity Disorder in Adolescents”. We believe that his methods are harmful to young people and that his theories on transgenderism are both outdated and rejected by most of the psychological community as they are based on personal bias and flawed methodology.

We respectfully ask that you replace him with a contributor to the conference who does not give such offence to the transgendered community.

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/zucker/index.html

Squigglefish adds: The London Transfeminism discussion group is planning a protest at this event.

Posted by: transpassage | August 20, 2008

DSM-V

Looking at the stats page on my WordPress account, I’ve noticed that at least one-third of all of my traffic comes from people searching out something related to the DSM-V update.  Blanchard, Zucker, Ehrensaft . . . all of them are frequently in the mix together.  And my most popular posts (numbers 1 and 2) are each written about the DSM-V working group selections. 

So - is there no real clearinghouse for commentary on this news?  I get a lot from doing searchs on the APA’s website and on Mercedes’ blog, Dented Blue Mercedes.  I’m just continually surprised that people might possibly be coming here for opinions or information on what’s happening.  What do ya’ll think, silently readers of the DSM related posts?

Posted by: transpassage | July 30, 2008

Into the closet (for the moment)?

It seems as though it’s time for me to write something a bit more personal here.

But I’m not going to.

I’ve recently realized that I have some personal things to take care of in my private life before I continue to broadcast this process on the internet.  Whatever this process is or becomes.  To some extent, this is a strange thing to say, because I realize that I haven’t been writing too much about my personal life on here lately anyway.  However, for those reading exclusively for transition-related updates, rather than my running commentary on LGBT news and events, my blog may become a bit dull for awhile.

This does not mean that I’m unwilling to discuss any of these details privately - offline and off record.   If you already have my contact information (email, cell, what have you), feel free to call me to chat it up.  If not,  post a comment and I’ll get the information to you.

I’m taking a step back from all of this until I figure out some career/life path decisions that must be made before I decide whether or not to move forward on this front.  Not that I’d decided to transition yet - obvious because that’s the process I had hypothetically hoped to work through somewhat publicly here - but even public discussion of these decisions needs to take a back seat for the moment.  I had previously thought that I was happy and ok with limiting my career options by making gender decisions that society does not fully endorse (and I may have already irrevocably limited them in that and other ways), but this turned out to be desperately wrong.  Until I know that I’ve already screwed myself over, so to speak, or I decide that I’m wholly ok with the decision I’m making… I won’t be posting about that part of my life here.

I wish this weren’t the case, mostly because I’m absolutely certain that other gender questioning and gender variant people must be running into the same kinds of questions as they start down this path.  I’ve found great comfort and help in reading the online thoughts of the community at times that an offline community is unavailable.  Aside from allowing friends inside to know what’s happening in my life, I’d hoped this might eventually serve as a resource for other gender variant, genderqueer, gender non-conforming, etc., people that might be considering more traditional options in the transgender community, but were feeling excluded or uncertain as to whether the transition path fit them (I’m obviously still not sure it fits me).

Well, that’s enough for now.  I need to get to work.  I may write a little more on this here - and regardless, keep checking back, because I have no idea how long this hiatus will last (a week, a month, a year.. who knows?).  Many thanks to all.

Posted by: transpassage | July 11, 2008

Old ball and chain

And in silly news for the day, apparently the Wisconsin Family Council is threatening to use a 1915 law against same-sex couples that go out of state to marry in California and then return with their marriage license.  If anyone is actually prosecuted (CNN’s American Morning acted like it was already happening, of course, but this local broadcast seems a lot clearer on the unlikelihood of that happening or you can hear about it while listening to strange video game music on YouTube), getting your gay marriage groove on will cost up to $10,000 and nine years in jail.

Posted by: transpassage | July 2, 2008

Of Christians, Lies, and Queers: More on Bolthouse Farms

Bolthouse Farms juicesAs a follow up to my earlier post on the connection between Bolthouse Farms, the Bolthouse Foundation, and anti-LGBT donations, I wanted to point people toward this post that went up last Friday.  Alex Blaze does a great job digging into the specifics of the past and ongoing relationship between Bolthouse Farms and the Bolthouse Foundation, despite the company’s denial that it has any current ties to the right-wing foundation. 

Interestingly, the Foundation has gone so far as to change it’s mission statement since my last post on the topic in order to further the misinformation.  The mission statement originally read: “The Bolthouse Foundation is a private family foundation funded by some of the former owners of Wm. Bolthouse Farms”.  Now they’ve amended it to include a much longer missive about their connection with Bolthouse Farms:

Mr. and Mrs. William J. Bolthouse sold their interest in Wm. Bolthouse Farms in late 2005, and since then The Bolthouse Foundation has reflected their giving decisions exclusively. The Bolthouse Foundation is a separate entity from Bolthouse Farms, and all funding decisions by The Bolthouse Foundation are made solely by the Foundation. No members of The Bolthouse Foundation have a financial interest in Bolthouse Farms, and The Bolthouse Foundation receives neither financial support nor benefits from the profits of Bolthouse Farms. 

Apparently, it’s not Christian to be a queer, but it is perfectly Christian to lie.

(Photo credit: Bolthouse Farms)

Older Posts »

Categories